Pages

Showing posts with label society. Show all posts
Showing posts with label society. Show all posts

Tuesday, 19 May 2015

Reality Check...On Social Media Platforms

I don’t quite get what social media is all about. There I have said it. It feels a bit like the 'emperor’s new clothes syndrome', everyone is doing it but no one really understands why they do it or what the point of it is. Or perhaps they do and it’s just me who does not get it.

Here is the thing, for example on my Facebook there are at least 35 people who daily promote themselves and their business/product /service. They religiously write daily status updates, post pictures and videos where they tell you how to live your life, change your life, be awesome. I realised that this is usually the build up to the book they are about to launch or the event (workshop, webinar, course) they want you to attend. Which is all well and good but is that what social media is really all about? Is it simply a space for self-promotion along with the blatant marketing of products and services to a semi captive and somewhat vulnerable audience?

I used to read every single status update as I felt that if someone made the effort to write it, it deserved to be read. Honestly, it made my head spin as there was so much, all the time. It was extremely time consuming.  
Then I found out that I could choose which posts I wanted to see simply by going to settings and eliminating those posts I did not want to see. (Now that brings out the Simon Cowell in all of us). But it’s also kind of cowardly as the person posting is not aware that you are no longer interested in seeing their posts. C’est la vie! Of course its not just Facebook, it’s the same story with Instagram, Twitter (where instead of likes you have followers who validate you), LinkedIn and all the social media platforms out there.

So what is the point of social media? Why has it become a lifestyle for so many? Like so much about the Internet there seems to be the good, the bad and the ugly. 

The good of social media platforms is that is does connect people. Also there are posts that do have gravitas and bring awareness to social issues, as in Jimmy Thornton’s posts about the struggles and triumphs of the LBGT community.  Or Debbie Zarb Cousin who posts about the cruelty that animals needlessly endure and the appalling conditions they are raised in. 
Both Debbie and Jimmy post from a place of authenticity and passion, their posts are not scripted, they don’t post for personal gain or to earn popularity points but for the greater good.

The bad is that because of social media we are living in a “Facebook Happy” social construct where our children must be smart, brilliant and adorable, where everyone must be gorgeous and successful, where all businesses grow magically to unprecedented heights, careers flourish and where everyone’s life must be amazing and full of endless parties, fancy dinners, holidays, shopping sprees and if its not, then don’t bother posting. 
No one is interested. 
Maybe that’s because when it comes to real life we are all on an even playing field (everyone has some serious crap going on in their lives) and as my grandmother used to say ‘ we all have a cross to bear”. Maybe we don’t really want to hear about someone else’s struggles or pain as that will force us to acknowledge that the real world is far from Facebook Happy.

The ugly is that there is an enormous amount of self-promotion going on, which is ok really but to what end? It also allows anonymity that can led to a certain type of meanness that blocks, unfriend, unfollows people without their knowledge.

I know that social media is here to stay. After all it’s convenient, it gives us fleeting moments of recognition and it’s free.  It checks off a lot of the boxes we need to satisfy our social needs without having to actually physically interact with people and it drip feeds the feel good factor. So it keeps you going back for more. 

It will be interesting to see how far social media will push the social boundaries envelope. Also, at which point in the game will we become conscious and get what it is really all about.



Monday, 27 April 2015

Labels Are For Jars


From random dialogues, conversations and thoughts comes insight, reasoning, awareness and an opportunity to share and connect. For example, a casual remark on the Starbucks Caramel Frappuccino led to this random dialogue on labels… via Beyoncé, gays, equality (or lack of), hate crimes and Oprah. 
Towards the end of the article, Silva Neves, a good friend and a psychotherapist at The Hudson Centre gives his professional insight on the conversation. (It's always good to have an expert on board)


                    Labels Are For Jars



Settinglong drive to Essex to see family with The Boy.
Stop at Starbucks to pick up coffee… Carmel Frappuccinos.
Driving on the A20. Beyoncé plays in the background. Sipping the coffee or rather the frappucino.
And then the remark that triggered this random dialogue… “Starbucks makes good coffee. But why do they need to give coffee such fancy names? Coffee is just coffee, isn’t it?”

Which leads toit's funny how we tend to emphasise that which makes people different. You mean like Beyoncé is referred to as a “Black singer/performer versus a singer/performer’
Or “ a Muslim terrorist versus terrorist”
Or "a gay marriage versus a marriage”
Or “ women owned business versus a business”
Or “a gay man versus a man”

Which leads to …how many people go round introducing himself or herself by their sexual identity and gender as in “Hi, I am a white heterosexual man or woman”? How many times have you heard Madonna or Katy Perry being referred to as white singers/performers? Never! And why is it ok to say ‘women owned business’ or ‘minority owned business’ but we never say a male owned business or a white owed business?

Which leads to… the media who perpetuate this practice (or began it) since every report in the paper will highlight that the person involved is gay, Black, Asian, Muslim, Jewish, disabled, and will also refer to their age, race and socio economic status. However they rarely, if ever, mention that the person is a white male, middle class, heterosexual and Christian.

Which leads to… the sham that is equality, that mainstay of our society, that word that is casually thrown around by anyone who wants to be seen as politically correct and that word that strikes fear into HR departments and politicians.
Equality = acceptance, yet as a rule we do not accept that which is not our “norm”. Mentally (subconsciously or not) we refuse to unconditionally accept that which does not accurately reflect or represent us and our beliefs, our values, our sexual orientation, our religion and our culture.

Which leads to… hate crimes. In an age where equality and tolerance is on everyone’s agenda, hate crimes are on the rise. Now that’s ironic. In 2014, the statistics are staggering with over 80,000 hate crimes being committed against race, sexual orientation, disability and religion. The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime (London) Stephen Greenlaigh sums up why hate crimes happen, “However far too often people become targets of hate crimes simply because of who they are or what they look like”. Seriously? Simply because people look or act different they should expect to be beaten up, vilified, marginalised and bullied.

Which leads to… being authentic. Oprah preaches that everyone needs to be their authentic self. If only we lived in a perfect world, Oprah! Well, it paid off for her, as evidenced in her now famous quote “I had no idea that being your authentic self could make me as rich as I've become. If I had, I'd have done it a lot earlier”. However for many, the journey to their authentic self is filled with obstacles, heartbreak, despair, suffering and they may never arrive.

Which leads to… “I don’t like saying I am gay because the minute I do, something shifts, sometimes it is only a very very tiny shift but a shift nonetheless. And from that moment on I am labelled. My sexual preference defines me and who I am and what I do.”

Which leads to…“Why do I have to be defined by the labels society feels it needs to give me? Labels that they (society) made up and that they use to define who I am and what I am. I know who I am, I don’t need a label”.
Which leads to… “ Labels are for jars. People are not jars. I don’t need a label”.

Which leads us back to that random beginning..”Starbucks does have good coffee”. Agreed!

Silva’s insight to the conversation… I get that, in a perfect world, labels are only for jars. I also agree that in our world today, equality is a sham. And true equality would make the world a better place.
However, the psychology of human beings is quite different. From our very first moment in this world we discriminate. A baby discriminates between the voices of his/her mother to those of strangers. The baby will decide whom to smile to and whom to scream at, based on what is familiar to him/her. Why? For survival!
Human beings are wired to survive. Although mostly unconscious, the survival instinct, present from birth, is one of the most primal inbuilt mechanisms in our brain.
We, as human beings, like what is familiar and fear what is not.
We like what looks like us and fear what looks different from us.
So, putting labels on things, and people, make us feel safe.

‘This person looks very different to me, wearing strange clothes and eating unknown food. But it is OK, because this person is Black African and therefore I feel safe because I know what it is that is different, and I don’t feel threatened’.

Labelling a Muslim terrorist makes us feel safe because we can dissociate from it, and say: ‘it is them, not me’.

Labelling a gay man makes the heterosexual population feel safe. ‘They are different, but it is ok, we know why, they are gay, so I’m safe, I don’t have to question myself.’

Also, if we want to be very particular, one can argue that a Starbucks coffee is not just coffee, it is coffee that has the particular flavour of Starbucks. When we say ‘Starbucks coffee’ we know we will not get Costa coffee.

A gay person needs to have the survival instinct switched on because of so much homophobia that still exists. Whether we want to admit it to ourselves or not, a gay person continuously picks up messages about the world around them in order to evaluate what/ where is safe or not.
Currently there are so many subtle and not so subtle messages coming from Muslim and Christian communities wanting gay people dead. Based on those messages, a gay person’s survival instinct will be discriminatory…for the sake of safety. Therefore, subconsciously, it will require getting to know a Christian/Muslim person before fully trusting them. This is not the case if a gay man meets another gay man in Old Compton Street (sameness = safety).
Society feels the need to label people because, although labelling can and does have a lot of negative consequences, it also has one major advantage: safety. And the need for safety outweighs the need to be equal.
I also dream of a world where labels are just for jars. And because I am optimistic, I would like to believe it is possible. I think that the way we can achieve this as society is by education and experience.
If we all allowed ourselves to experience the world of others that are not like us, perhaps in time, we can re-wire our brain and reduce our inbuilt mechanism of safeguarding.
But there is a long way to go. Most groups stick together in area clusters, not engaging with the rest of society. I have met many Muslim people who have never left Tower Hamlets.I have met many gay people who refuse to step beyond Soho. 
We don’t mix enough. The multi-cultural society is also a sham. We are not mutli-cultural. We live side by side but we don’t really interact, engage and talk to each other enough.

Of course, I am not saying that everybody stays in clusters. There are many people who do mix comfortably with other cultures. But, in my opinion, there is not enough of us doing so.
And there is also too many groups that promote the death of others. 


Unfortunately, these groups do have a loud voice. Some hide behind religious ideas, as seen repeatedly in the case of homophobes.
When there is a step forward in equality, such as gay marriage, there is a big increase in those voices, trying to fight it, which, in turn, increases our inbuilt safeguarding mechanism, instead of reducing it.

Change, however, always starts with conversations such as this one, between The Boy and his mother. The cynical part of me does not believe that I will live long enough to see a world where ‘coming out’ is not necessary anymore, with true equality and acceptance of all, as one human race. But the hopeful part of me wishes that The Boy (who is much younger than me) will see that world in his lifetime”.
** Silva Neves is a qualified psychosexual, relationship and couple's therapist. He specialises in working with couples and individuals who experience difficulties in their intimate relationships and sexuality.
 How do you feel about labels?
Share your random thoughts, you never know where they will lead to...
.

Saturday, 1 November 2014

Reality check on…The Horror, The Horror

I am seriously pissed off. And also very sad. 
A 17year old is beaten to within an inch of his life. By his friends. Why? Well, the fact that he is gay obviously bothered his ‘friends’ and so, they beat the shit out of him.

As the mother of a gay son, I am horrified, saddened, angry and yes, pissed off by this news.
Not only because this could happen to my boy (and let's face it, this could happen to anyone else’s son/daughter/ brother/sister/ mother/father); 
But also because I really believed that my son was fortunate to be born in a time where tolerance and compassion were part of everyone’s consciousness; and his sexual identify would not define him as a person and he would not be labelled; where he could be and do what he chose since “”Everyone has the right to life and to live in freedom and safety” (Universal declaration of Human Rights)

Am I delusional or what? Nothing has really changed, has it?
Is society still stuck in the mind-set of that sea of sameness as it has been since the beginning of time?...That same mind-set where anyone or anything, that is different, even a little bit, is automatically clocked and registered as abnormal and unacceptable.  

Granted that on the surface governments, corporations and businesses are seen to be working towards becoming more inclusive in the work place and they do make some effort to educate and inform people. 
But really? Do we need government mandates and training to accept gays, women and all diversity groups in the work place and in the community?
WTF? Are we that logically and consciousness deprived?

And what is normal and acceptable to this society? Here's what I think that list probably looks like and most likely, it has not changed much over the centuries:
  1. A man can only be in a relationship with a woman. End of.
  2. Its ok to eat animals that have been made to suffer needlessly and then brutally killed as long as you buy the meat at the supermarket.
  3. Always worship that invisible god; the one who is vengeful, self-righteous and vindictive and who has a major issue with anyone who is NOT a straight, white, Christian male
  4. If you have lots of money, you are automatically absolved of all wrongs
  5. Making a bad choice makes you a bad person. Forever.
  6. I am ok with everything as long as it does not affect me. In any way.
  7. It’s not ok to judge but it is definitely ok and encouraged to criticise, publicly humiliate and ostracise anyone or anything that is unfamiliar or different.
  8. Success is measured in the accumulation of the number of possessions you own
  9. Be politically correct on the surface; as long as you are seen to be PC that’s all that matters. 
  10. Everyone is considered my brother and sister as long as I am kept completely unaware of their existence.
What an incredibly close minded society we live in !

We have not evolved into decent human beings; we just got better at hiding how we really feel.

Social media makes it so easy for us to be universally seen as the intellectual, open minded, spiritual, accepting, non judgemental, free spirits we so obviously are not. 

We can visibly support same sex marriages, express outrage at the merciless treatment of battery chickens, sign petitions to stop child labour, domestic violence, child abuse… all the while we are smugly secure in the knowledge that we will never, ever be called upon to publicly defend any of the shit we are seen to be supporting.

Social media lets us tick off that box that says to the world…”yes I am a tolerant person who believes and supports everyone’s basic human right to live, regardless of their religious beliefs, sexual orientation, cultural background, gender or politics”. The sad reality is that there is no substance or conviction or belief behind that ticked box.

Back to the boy who was beaten for being gay 
By the way, this is not an isolated incident; this senseless, aggressive, bullying is rampant the world over against gays, Jews, Romas, women, children, the list goes on and on. 
Here is a quick snapshot of recent UK hate crimes statistics:



How many more people need to be beaten, bullied, shamed and killed because of who they are or what they believe in? At what point do we draw the line in the sand and say enough is enough?

As you read the article about Dylan,many of you will probably shrug your shoulders, as in ‘it’s not my problem’ and move on; others may spare a couple of seconds lamenting the state of the world.  But for a significant number, it is a very real reminder that their world is not safe and that they live under the constant threat of violence and abuse.
This is not ok; I need the world to be a safe place for my son and for everyone else’s son and daughter. We all do!